“Believe in God, not the religious
people’s God,
but the God who created the universe
and everything in it.”
- Allrock (a.k.a. Carlo Torres)
This is not about the song of the
same title by one of my favorite rock bands, REM. I can’t just think of a title more
appropriate than this. And it’s not
about God either. It’s more about the practice
of organized worship of the Almighty One.
As a young boy growing up in
rural idyllic Potrero (Bacolor, Pampanga), my Sundays were not complete without
attending the early morning Catholic mass with my late mom and my two
siblings. In later years, my late dad
would join us. Until I entered college,
we would be at these Sunday rites without fail.
I still remember the times when
the first pews from the altar were hardly filled by the handful families who
never doubted the faith, so to speak, at that time. This was not the case in earlier years,
though. This sad state resulted,
according to my parents, from the unilateral (whimsical, too, if I may add)
decision of the parish priest to transfer the seat of the parish from Potrero
to another barrio. The reason he cited
was the conversion of some residents to Iglesia ni Cristo.
The people of course did not buy
this explanation. The bold and
irreverent among the parishioners insinuated that the said priest was swayed
into this by his secretary, who was from the other barrio, after she allegedly
became his paramour. I also heard my dad
tell his reminiscing of old Potrero to fellow residents near his age that
tended to support this assertion a couple years before he died—unlike my mom;
he retained his lucid mind despite his very advanced age.
My dad was one of the first
residents to own a passenger jeepney and would drive this priest—and his
predecessor—around every now and then.
That was the time when secular priests did not own flashy cars like the
ones that we now have. He was therefore
privy to some of that priest’s “extracurricular” liaisons. This, may be, was one of the reasons why he
wasn’t with us during those masses that we’d attended early on. Will you follow someone as sinful as, if not
more than, you? The other reason, he
was, may be, also deep into his own dalliances at that time.
Of course, this was non-issue to
us few families even if some of our fellow barrio residents made fun of
us. The nasty joke then was there were
more goats occupying the pews than us believers. This was of course untrue but there were
indeed goats inside the chapel especially when it’s raining. It did not take long though when attendance
started to pick up and soon the church pews were filled by human
churchgoers. This was when the concerned
priest was transferred to another parish and a new one took his place.
My church-going days peaked when
I was attending Don Bosco Academy (Bacolor) for my secondary education, where attendance
in the daily mass at the school chapel is compulsory. Then, it was downhill from there. I just realized that I hardly visited the
church and went to mass when I started attending UPLB in 1976. No, it’s not because of activism or
communism. In fact, my activism only
became full-blast when I transferred to GAUF in the summer of 1984. It’s just that my religious fervor was not as
intense as it used to.
This was
engendered by the liberal ideas that slowly permeated into my consciousness,
which, in turn, brought about my realization that more than your regular
presence in organized worships it's how you deal with and treat your fellow
human and other beings that mattered more. I won’t deny it though that my
flirtation with Marxism at that time had led me farther away from my religious
practices.
The most frequently quoted, and
most likely misunderstood, statement of the German economist and revolutionary
socialist Karl Marx, “Religion is the opium of the people (Die Religion…ist das Opium des Volkes)”, impacted greatly on
me. This was despite the fact that I
have not read the complete text of what was supposed to be Marx’s introduction
to his proposed work "A Contribution
to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right", which was never completely written. This introduction was published
though in 1844.
As I started to understand a few basic
Marxist concepts, I was puzzled no end why various churches, including the
Catholic Church, never howled protests over the evils spawned by unjust
economic, political and social orders worldwide. They never condemned the wrong doings and
excesses of the states and their officials against their peoples. The few prelates, priests and pastors who did
were considered pariahs by their own churches in general. Most of them, I’d heard, adhered to and
practiced Liberation Theology.
Particularly in the country, they
had the gall to openly endorse and support the Marcos dictatorship. They were very sparing though in their
condemnation, if not totally tight-lipped, over the barefaced human rights
violations perpetrated by the various state apparatuses that were, in the first
place, created and tasked to safeguard and uphold these very same rights of the
people, including their followers.
My great disenchantments continue
to this day. Church leaders of
practically all religious denominations continue to be part of the coteries
that surround the leaders and officials of the national and local
governments. And these are the very same
leaders and officials who are linked to all the evils and wrongdoings in our politics
and governance. Without doubt, this is
the greatest proof of the failure of religions to make man turn his back from
evil deeds.
The most likely greatest
Kapampangan thief, if convicted, who’s now on hospital arrest had been
personally ministered no less by the Kapampangan prince of the Catholic priests. And by other “great lights” of other religions,
too. But look where she is now.
Look also at the other members of
the greedy thieving class. Under the blinding
glare of klieg lights, they acted out their profession of innocence either
within or after religious rites especially administered by men of the
cloth. These men of the cloth appeared
blinded by these klieg lights as they looked clueless on their sickening roles
in the vaudeville that’s unfolding in practically all the idiot boxes in every
home. I pity these men for they still
don’t—or are they just pretending they don’t?—realize that they’re to blame,
more than other people, for how this thieving class has turned out despite the
special attention they’ve accorded to them.
The true Almighty One is indeed
the well of bottomless mercy for He did not strike them with lightning while
deeply enthralled in their vaudeville.
How I wish that the blinding glare of klieg lights could follow them in
their detention cells 24/7, so that they’ll be forced to make good their
promise to read the Bibles while waiting for their exoneration. Who knows, they might finally “see the
light”, admit their sins and, more importantly, spare us from their unfolding
badly scripted vaudeville.
Will you blame me losing my
religion against this backdrop? For
quite some time, I wasn’t as candid and true to myself in admitting this. I would reply Nominal Catholic whenever I'm asked what my religion was. But if you’re a Catholic, you’re just a
Catholic without any qualifier. The
moment you attach the word nominal, you’re in reality no longer
a Catholic for you’re not subscribing to all what was expected from the
faithful.
But I have my reasons for this,
though. One is I don’t want to get into arguments
and explain why I don’t have one. I
found it more conventional and easier to explain the attached qualifier. This is especially with people who believe
that only through their religions that one can be saved and attain eternal
life in the bosom of the Almighty One.
In the first place, I’m not motivated to live my life on earth to have
eternal life in the Great Beyond. I
simply try to live my maxim: live
to do good (as much as I could) and not to harm (as much I could) any fellow
human and other beings.
This may sound simplistic but
it’s equally as hard to follow as any dictates of other religions.
Two is I don't know how to classify and call myself. I'm certainly not an agnostic; for I still believe in the existence of a Supreme Being that designed the universe we're in. But unlike most, I don't find the need to worship this Supreme Being in organized manner they do. The way I live my life is my way of worshiping that Supreme Being. I therefore don't find the need to belong to a religious denomination and have no intention to join another one in the future.
Two is I don't know how to classify and call myself. I'm certainly not an agnostic; for I still believe in the existence of a Supreme Being that designed the universe we're in. But unlike most, I don't find the need to worship this Supreme Being in organized manner they do. The way I live my life is my way of worshiping that Supreme Being. I therefore don't find the need to belong to a religious denomination and have no intention to join another one in the future.
If atheists, as claimed by the
current pope, Pope Francis, can be saved from eternal damnation, the more
chances that I could be being not one. There
is therefore no urgency to belong to a new religion or to return to the old one. In the final analysis, all religions are man’s creations based on his perceptions on how best to venerate Him and, in return, be assured of a place in
Paradise.
In the end, too, there are no such things as
perfect and absolute. Not even Almighty One’s creations. Just look at
man! (30)